2/27/2024 0 Comments Cabin fever 2016 torrent![]() Viewers expecting a good, entertaining film will be disappointed, and find this to be a total waste of time, which this film is. This third film has no good storyline to it, and is plagued with some poor performances. This third film in the Cabin Fever is yet again a failed attempt at trying to make a good sequel. A sequel appeared years later, but it failed to capture the essence of the original, and it was a poorly made film that just failed to grab your attention, and it failed to really entertain you. The original Cabin Fever was a great film, and paved the way for new ideas in the genre. Show Less Show MoreĬabin Fever 3 is a bland, poorly constructed horror film that doesn't have anything going for it. I can't recommend really go out of my way to recommend it, but trust me when I say that this is better than it seems. The film doesn't really come together as a whole, but it's got some good ideas as a building block for the future. It's got spectacular gore, good cinematography, and a few genuinely cool moments. While the film's story still deals in cliches and genre conventions, it is never as bad as one would've feared going in. I just like that idea of taking stuff that happened off-screen and showing it during the credits, it's just cool to me. I wish more films would do this, I remember Wild Things doing this as well, without playing it in reverse, and it worked well then. They do so rewinding the footage and it was actually a really cool little thing to do. I did like how, at the end, in between the credits, they showed you exactly what happened off-screen, in the main film, that set off the entire chain of events. The story isn't really clever or that inventive, but it gets the job done. The film has some good cinematography as well, this is a nice film to look at, which is another aspect of the film that surprised me. I can't really complain that much though, it is a horror film.so what can you expect? Suspension of disbelief is important. So this scene with the gun flipping out of this dude's hand and getting stuck in his face seems a little preposterous. And I say slight because the film doesn't deal with this in a realistic manner. ![]() This idea of a flesh-eating disease isn't as preposterous as one would think, so in a way, while it's obvious that this is exaggerated in some form being that it is a horror film, there's some slight realism involved. I think it defies every law of physics ever conceived. ![]() What I don't get is the gun flipping AND then flying into his face. I can get the fact that it would kill him because his skin was so debilitated due to this virus that this gun could get stuck in his face. When he shoots the gun, the force of which was so strong, that it caused his hand to completely detach itself from his arm, flip around and get stuck in his face, which killed him. He points a gun at Dobbs, to kill him obviously. You can see that this guy has been suffering from the effects of this virus for the longest time. Dobbs, escaping like the coward he is, runs into this big guy with a gun. So Dobbs selfishly locked the door behind him to leave Marcus to fend for himself against an infected person. There's also a really hilariously bad scene there. That's just the one I can think up off the top of my head. That's the main highlight as it relates to gore, because there's so much going as far as make-up effects, the actress who plays Penny had her entire body covered in this, so hats off to them, but it's not the only instance of good gore effects in this film. And it actually did fall off at the slightest touch. Their skin looks absolutely terrible, as if it was almost to fall off at the slightest touch. It really looks as if a flesh-eating disease has truly taken its horrible toll on them. It's horribly choreographed, but the make-up looks absolutely outstanding. Look at the scene where Penny and Bridgett fight each other. Massive respect to the production crew for that and it really pays off. You have to applaud the production crew for letting a big chunk of their budget go to the practical special, and make-up, effects when they very easily could've saved that money by doing everything on computers. There's absolutely no delegating to a CG team to handle all the blood and gore, it's absolutely practical and the film really is better for it. Then again, my appreciation for the film mostly comes in the fact that the special effects and the make-up for the film are absolutely top-notch. You know, given that it is a direct-to-video, low budget horror prequel. But, for a movie that deals in cliches and established horror conventions, this film is never as bad as you think it was bound to be. Yes, for the most part, it is a by-the-numbers affair with a typical horror cast and horror tropes. You know, this was quite the surprising film.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |